[ ]
Latest News Updates
Showing posts with label Clinical Pharmacy. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Clinical Pharmacy. Show all posts
By Piscean | Saturday, April 16, 2011 | Posted in | With 0 comments
Patient-Related Factors
Age, disease states, genetics, gender, nutrition, multidrug therapy use, and herbal therapies use are patient-related factors that influence the likelihood of adverse drug reactions.

Age-geriatrics
Age-related alterations in pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics may affect the response of elderly patients to certain medications, and may increase the susceptibility for ADRs among elderly patients (13- 15) (Table 1). The risk of ADRs among elderly patients is probably not due to age alone. ADRs may be related more to the degree of frailty and medical conditions of the patient (15). On average, older persons have five or more coexisting diseases that may increase the risk of adverse events. Polypharmacy seems to be more of a common problem among the elderly. The average elderly patient takes 4.5 chronic medications and fills 13 prescriptions yearly (15). Elderly patients appear to have a decline in homeostatic mechanisms. The imbalance of homeostatic mechanisms and the decline in function reserves may put a patient at greater risk for ADEs due to decreased tolerance of medications and the ability to handle stressful situations (16).
Age-pediat rics
The two factors responsible for increasing risks of ADRs in children are pharmacokinetic changes and dose delivery issues. Age-related differences in pharmacokinetics in children are documented (17). However, the data on both efficacy and safety are often limited or not studied at all in this population. Thus, it is unclear whether an increased risk for ADRs exists in this group.
However, there is a potential risk for increased ADRs if appropriate considerations are not taken into account in view of pharmacokinetic changes (18). It is important to note that only one-fourth of the drugs approved by the FDA have indications specific for use in a pediatric population (17). Medications used in adults are often given to children without FDA safety and efficacy data. Compatibility and stability issues with dosage forms intended for adults that have been altered (e.g., dilution or reformulation) can increase risks for ADRs. Information on pediatric age-related difference in neonates, children, and adolescents may aid in prevention of pediatric ADRs (18) (Table 2). Further studies of drug use in pediatrics are needed in order to prevent ADRs.

Concurrent diseases
Diseases such as hepatic or renal diseases can influence the incidence of ADRs by altering the pharmacokinetics of drugs, such as absorption, distribution, metabolism, or excretion (6).

Hepatic disease
Patients with liver disease have an increased susceptibility to certain drugs due to decreased hepatic clearance for drugs metabolized by the liver or due to enhanced sensitivity (6). For example, impaired hepatic metabolism can precipitate central nervous system (CNS) toxicity in patients on theophylline, phenytoin, or lidocaine; or ergot poisoning on ergotamine (19). Increased sensitivity to drugs is also encountered in liver disease( 19). The use of anticoagulants increases the risk of bleeding due to the reduced absorption of vitamin K or decreased production of vitamin K-dependent clotting
factors. There is an enhanced risk for respiratory depression and hepatic encephalopathy due to morphine Vigorous use of diuretics can precipitate hepatic coma due to potassium loss in liver disease. There is an increased risk of hypoglycemia with sulphonylurea antidiabetic drugs due to decreased glycogenesis in liver disease. Liver disease can also cause hypoalbuminemia due to decreased liver synthesis of albumin. For drugs that are extensively bound to albumin, such as phenytoin, an enhanced risk of drug toxicity could occur because of the increase in free drug concentration.
There are no useful methods to quantify the degree of liver disease that can assist in dosage adjustment. A practical approach involves checking patients for elevated
prothrombin time, rising bilirubin levels, and/or falling albumin levels. In such instances, drugs that have an altered response in liver disease or cause hepatotoxicity need to be avoided. Renal disease Impaired renal function increases the incidence of ADRs for drugs that depend on the kidney for their elimination. Unlike liver disease, use of pharmacokinetic dosing principles can minimize the risk for adverse effects.

Mechanisms responsible for enhanced ADRs in renal disease include delayed drug excretion, decreased protein binding due to hypoalbuminemia, and increased drug sensitivity (6). Delayed renal excretion is responsible for enhanced toxicity with drugs such as aminoglycosides, digoxin, vancomycin, chlorpropamide, H2-antagonists, allopurinol, lithium, insulin, and methotrexate (20). For some drugs, the accumulation of a toxic metabolite during renal failure is responsible for ADRs. This is the case with meperidine, where a toxic metabolite, normeperidine, accumulates in renal failure (20). Patients with accumulation of uremic toxins have increased sensitivity to certain drugs. There may be anenhanced response to CNS depressants (such as barbiturates and benzodiazepines), hemorrhagic effects from aspirin or warfarin, and other bleeding effects from antibiotics that inhibit platelet aggregation, such as carbenicillin, ticarcillin, and piperacillin.

Other diseases
On theoretical grounds, other diseases associated with hypoalbuminemia could predispose patients to adverse reactions and to altered responses to drugs that are highly protein bound (21) (Table 3).
The presence of other diseases can influence the risk for ADRs. Many of these adverse effects are related to an extension of the pharmacologic effects of the drug in the presence of certain pathophysiology. Numerous examples are given in Table 4 (6). Patients who have had a previous reaction to drugs are also more likely to experience an ADR (22). Patients with history of allergic diseases also have an increased risk due to a genetically related ability to form immunoglobulin E.
By Piscean | | Posted in | With 0 comments
Patient-Related Factors
Age, disease states, genetics, gender, nutrition, multidrug therapy use, and herbal therapies use are patient-related factors that influence the likelihood of adverse drug reactions.

Age-geriatrics
Age-related alterations in pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics may affect the response of elderly patients to certain medications, and may increase the susceptibility for ADRs among elderly patients (13- 15) (Table 1). The risk of ADRs among elderly patients is probably not due to age alone. ADRs may be related more to the degree of frailty and medical conditions of the patient (15). On average, older persons have five or more coexisting diseases that may increase the risk of adverse events. Polypharmacy seems to be more of a common problem among the elderly. The average elderly patient takes 4.5 chronic medications and fills 13 prescriptions yearly (15). Elderly patients appear to have a decline in homeostatic mechanisms. The imbalance of homeostatic mechanisms and the decline in function reserves may put a patient at greater risk for ADEs due to decreased tolerance of medications and the ability to handle stressful situations (16).
Age-pediat rics
The two factors responsible for increasing risks of ADRs in children are pharmacokinetic changes and dose delivery issues. Age-related differences in pharmacokinetics in children are documented (17). However, the data on both efficacy and safety are often limited or not studied at all in this population. Thus, it is unclear whether an increased risk for ADRs exists in this group.
However, there is a potential risk for increased ADRs if appropriate considerations are not taken into account in view of pharmacokinetic changes (18). It is important to note that only one-fourth of the drugs approved by the FDA have indications specific for use in a pediatric population (17). Medications used in adults are often given to children without FDA safety and efficacy data. Compatibility and stability issues with dosage forms intended for adults that have been altered (e.g., dilution or reformulation) can increase risks for ADRs. Information on pediatric age-related difference in neonates, children, and adolescents may aid in prevention of pediatric ADRs (18) (Table 2). Further studies of drug use in pediatrics are needed in order to prevent ADRs.

Concurrent diseases
Diseases such as hepatic or renal diseases can influence the incidence of ADRs by altering the pharmacokinetics of drugs, such as absorption, distribution, metabolism, or excretion (6).

Hepatic disease
Patients with liver disease have an increased susceptibility to certain drugs due to decreased hepatic clearance for drugs metabolized by the liver or due to enhanced sensitivity (6). For example, impaired hepatic metabolism can precipitate central nervous system (CNS) toxicity in patients on theophylline, phenytoin, or lidocaine; or ergot poisoning on ergotamine (19). Increased sensitivity to drugs is also encountered in liver disease( 19). The use of anticoagulants increases the risk of bleeding due to the reduced absorption of vitamin K or decreased production of vitamin K-dependent clotting
factors. There is an enhanced risk for respiratory depression and hepatic encephalopathy due to morphine Vigorous use of diuretics can precipitate hepatic coma due to potassium loss in liver disease. There is an increased risk of hypoglycemia with sulphonylurea antidiabetic drugs due to decreased glycogenesis in liver disease. Liver disease can also cause hypoalbuminemia due to decreased liver synthesis of albumin. For drugs that are extensively bound to albumin, such as phenytoin, an enhanced risk of drug toxicity could occur because of the increase in free drug concentration.
There are no useful methods to quantify the degree of liver disease that can assist in dosage adjustment. A practical approach involves checking patients for elevated
prothrombin time, rising bilirubin levels, and/or falling albumin levels. In such instances, drugs that have an altered response in liver disease or cause hepatotoxicity need to be avoided. Renal disease Impaired renal function increases the incidence of ADRs for drugs that depend on the kidney for their elimination. Unlike liver disease, use of pharmacokinetic dosing principles can minimize the risk for adverse effects.

Mechanisms responsible for enhanced ADRs in renal disease include delayed drug excretion, decreased protein binding due to hypoalbuminemia, and increased drug sensitivity (6). Delayed renal excretion is responsible for enhanced toxicity with drugs such as aminoglycosides, digoxin, vancomycin, chlorpropamide, H2-antagonists, allopurinol, lithium, insulin, and methotrexate (20). For some drugs, the accumulation of a toxic metabolite during renal failure is responsible for ADRs. This is the case with meperidine, where a toxic metabolite, normeperidine, accumulates in renal failure (20). Patients with accumulation of uremic toxins have increased sensitivity to certain drugs. There may be anenhanced response to CNS depressants (such as barbiturates and benzodiazepines), hemorrhagic effects from aspirin or warfarin, and other bleeding effects from antibiotics that inhibit platelet aggregation, such as carbenicillin, ticarcillin, and piperacillin.

Other diseases
On theoretical grounds, other diseases associated with hypoalbuminemia could predispose patients to adverse reactions and to altered responses to drugs that are highly protein bound (21) (Table 3).
The presence of other diseases can influence the risk for ADRs. Many of these adverse effects are related to an extension of the pharmacologic effects of the drug in the presence of certain pathophysiology. Numerous examples are given in Table 4 (6). Patients who have had a previous reaction to drugs are also more likely to experience an ADR (22). Patients with history of allergic diseases also have an increased risk due to a genetically related ability to form immunoglobulin E.
By Piscean | | Posted in | With 0 comments
Drug Related Factors
Dose
ADRs may be the result of ingestion of increased amounts of a drug. Dosing issues are especially likely with narrow therapeutic index drugs. Examples of these types of drugs include digoxin, anticoagulants, anticonvulsants, antiarrhythmics, antineoplastic agents, bronchodilators, sedatives, and hypnotics (1 1).

Dosage form and delivery system
Many of the ADRs related to the dosage form and delivery system are the result of local irritation or hypersensitivity reactions (1 2). Local irritation to the gastrointestinal (GI) tract can occur with oral dosages. For example, toxicity resulting in mouth ulcerations is associated with antineoplastic drugs. In addition, the use of certain formulations, such as sustained release preparations, can increase esophageal injury if esophageal transit is delayed. For example, a controlled release wax matrix of potassium chloride has been associated with significant esophageal erosions. Factors identified to predispose to esophageal injury include large film-coated tablets, capsules, large sustainedrelease preparations, rapidly dissolving formulations, and ingestion of solid oral dosage forms before bed rest with very little water intake (12). Localized tissue irritation can be seen from the intramuscular (IM) route. This is especially an issue when the formulation pH differs from the pH of the surrounding tissue or when precipitation of poorly soluble drugs occurs (12). Incorrect administration of IM injections is probably the most important factor that causes local adverse effects. Local skin irritation can also be seen with transdermal delivery systems due to the alcohols, nonionic surfactants, and adhesives.
Hypersensitivity reactions can occur due to the presence of contaminants or excipients in pharmaceutical dosage forms (e.g., outbreaks of eosinophilia-myalgia syndrome associated with oral tryptophan contaminants in various drugs) (12). Another example is the anaphylactoid reactions to the surfactant Cremaophor EL, which is used in paclitaxel (Taxol).

Direct toxicity effects related to use of preservatives also has been documented. For example, severe metabolic acidosis and death in infants was attributed to the presence of benzyl alcohol. a preservative used in bacterostatic normal saline that was used to flush catheters (12).

The use of specific intravenous (IV) delivery devices also can cause ADRs. For instance, use of plastic infusion sets for IV administration of nitroglycerin has resulted in subtherapeutic effects due to diffusion of the drug into the plastic tubes (12).
Formulation effects, such as bioavailability differences, can cause ADRs when patients are switched to generic products. For example, significant adverse effects have occurred with anticonvulsants and thyroid preparations (12).

Interactions between drugs
It has been estimated that 6.9% of ADRs are due to drugdrug interactions (6). The most likely reason for an adverse drug interaction is the pharmacokinetic changes that result in altered metabolism or excretion of drugs, or the  pharmacodynamic changes that result in synergistic or additive effects of drugs.
By Piscean | | Posted in | With 0 comments
Drug Related Factors
Dose
ADRs may be the result of ingestion of increased amounts of a drug. Dosing issues are especially likely with narrow therapeutic index drugs. Examples of these types of drugs include digoxin, anticoagulants, anticonvulsants, antiarrhythmics, antineoplastic agents, bronchodilators, sedatives, and hypnotics (1 1).

Dosage form and delivery system
Many of the ADRs related to the dosage form and delivery system are the result of local irritation or hypersensitivity reactions (1 2). Local irritation to the gastrointestinal (GI) tract can occur with oral dosages. For example, toxicity resulting in mouth ulcerations is associated with antineoplastic drugs. In addition, the use of certain formulations, such as sustained release preparations, can increase esophageal injury if esophageal transit is delayed. For example, a controlled release wax matrix of potassium chloride has been associated with significant esophageal erosions. Factors identified to predispose to esophageal injury include large film-coated tablets, capsules, large sustainedrelease preparations, rapidly dissolving formulations, and ingestion of solid oral dosage forms before bed rest with very little water intake (12). Localized tissue irritation can be seen from the intramuscular (IM) route. This is especially an issue when the formulation pH differs from the pH of the surrounding tissue or when precipitation of poorly soluble drugs occurs (12). Incorrect administration of IM injections is probably the most important factor that causes local adverse effects. Local skin irritation can also be seen with transdermal delivery systems due to the alcohols, nonionic surfactants, and adhesives.
Hypersensitivity reactions can occur due to the presence of contaminants or excipients in pharmaceutical dosage forms (e.g., outbreaks of eosinophilia-myalgia syndrome associated with oral tryptophan contaminants in various drugs) (12). Another example is the anaphylactoid reactions to the surfactant Cremaophor EL, which is used in paclitaxel (Taxol).

Direct toxicity effects related to use of preservatives also has been documented. For example, severe metabolic acidosis and death in infants was attributed to the presence of benzyl alcohol. a preservative used in bacterostatic normal saline that was used to flush catheters (12).

The use of specific intravenous (IV) delivery devices also can cause ADRs. For instance, use of plastic infusion sets for IV administration of nitroglycerin has resulted in subtherapeutic effects due to diffusion of the drug into the plastic tubes (12).
Formulation effects, such as bioavailability differences, can cause ADRs when patients are switched to generic products. For example, significant adverse effects have occurred with anticonvulsants and thyroid preparations (12).

Interactions between drugs
It has been estimated that 6.9% of ADRs are due to drugdrug interactions (6). The most likely reason for an adverse drug interaction is the pharmacokinetic changes that result in altered metabolism or excretion of drugs, or the  pharmacodynamic changes that result in synergistic or additive effects of drugs.
By Piscean | | Posted in | With 0 comments
Factors predisposing Adverse Drug reactions
Two major factors predispose to adverse drug reactions: the drug itself and patient factors. Factors related to the drug include its dose, dosage form and delivery system, and interactions between drugs. Patient-related factors include age, disease states, genetics, gender, nutrition, multidrug therapy use, and use of herbal therapies.
By Piscean | | Posted in | With 0 comments
Factors predisposing Adverse Drug reactions
Two major factors predispose to adverse drug reactions: the drug itself and patient factors. Factors related to the drug include its dose, dosage form and delivery system, and interactions between drugs. Patient-related factors include age, disease states, genetics, gender, nutrition, multidrug therapy use, and use of herbal therapies.
By Piscean | | Posted in | With 0 comments
Incidence of Adverse Drug reaction
The frequency of ADRs in the general population is unknown. However, the reported rates of new occurrences for ADRs are noted for selected patient populations. A meta-analysis of 39 prospective studies reported an overall incidence of serious ADRs in hospitalized patients of 6.7% and of fatal ADRs of 0.32% (8). The fatality rate makes ADRs the fourth to sixth leading cause of death in the United States. Another meta-analysis of 36 studies indicated that approximately 5% of hospital admissions are due to ADRs (9). The costs of ADRs are estimated to be $1.56-$4 billion in direct hospital costs per year in the United States (10).
By Piscean | | Posted in | With 0 comments
Incidence of Adverse Drug reaction
The frequency of ADRs in the general population is unknown. However, the reported rates of new occurrences for ADRs are noted for selected patient populations. A meta-analysis of 39 prospective studies reported an overall incidence of serious ADRs in hospitalized patients of 6.7% and of fatal ADRs of 0.32% (8). The fatality rate makes ADRs the fourth to sixth leading cause of death in the United States. Another meta-analysis of 36 studies indicated that approximately 5% of hospital admissions are due to ADRs (9). The costs of ADRs are estimated to be $1.56-$4 billion in direct hospital costs per year in the United States (10).
By Piscean | | Posted in | With 0 comments
 Classification of Adrs

Four classification systems are uscd to describe ADRs (1, 7).

ADRs can be classified according to thepharmacologic effect of the drug-Type A, B, C, and D reactions.
    Type A reactions are exaggcrated but normal pharmacologic actions of a drug. They arc predictable and dose dependent.
    Type B reactions are not predictable given the known pharmacologic action of a drug and are not dose related. Many of these Type B reactions are hypersensitivity or immune-based. These reactions can bc further subdivided into type 1 (IgE-mediated rcaction), II(1gG or IgM-mcdiated cytotoxic reaction), 111 (IgGmediated immune complex reactions), and TV (ccllmediated immune reaction).       
   Typc C reactions are those due to long-term use of a drug.
    Typc D reactions are delayed drug effects, such as due to carcinogenicity or teratogenicity.

ADRs can also be classified according to the dose relationship, i.e., dose-related and non-dose-related reactions.

Another classification system is based on thc causal relationship between the reaction and thc drug. One of the most widely used causality classifications is based on Naranjo’ s descriptions. These categories include definite (drug is likely the true cause), probable (drug is the apparent cause), possible (drug appears to be associated), and remote (drug is not likely to be the cause).

The fourthclassification system is based on degree of injury or severity of reaction. There are mild reactions (temporary discomfort and tolerable), moderate (significant discomfort), and severe (potentially life threatening or causing permanent disability or death).
By Piscean | | Posted in | With 0 comments
 Classification of Adrs

Four classification systems are uscd to describe ADRs (1, 7).

ADRs can be classified according to thepharmacologic effect of the drug-Type A, B, C, and D reactions.
    Type A reactions are exaggcrated but normal pharmacologic actions of a drug. They arc predictable and dose dependent.
    Type B reactions are not predictable given the known pharmacologic action of a drug and are not dose related. Many of these Type B reactions are hypersensitivity or immune-based. These reactions can bc further subdivided into type 1 (IgE-mediated rcaction), II(1gG or IgM-mcdiated cytotoxic reaction), 111 (IgGmediated immune complex reactions), and TV (ccllmediated immune reaction).       
   Typc C reactions are those due to long-term use of a drug.
    Typc D reactions are delayed drug effects, such as due to carcinogenicity or teratogenicity.

ADRs can also be classified according to the dose relationship, i.e., dose-related and non-dose-related reactions.

Another classification system is based on thc causal relationship between the reaction and thc drug. One of the most widely used causality classifications is based on Naranjo’ s descriptions. These categories include definite (drug is likely the true cause), probable (drug is the apparent cause), possible (drug appears to be associated), and remote (drug is not likely to be the cause).

The fourthclassification system is based on degree of injury or severity of reaction. There are mild reactions (temporary discomfort and tolerable), moderate (significant discomfort), and severe (potentially life threatening or causing permanent disability or death).
By Piscean | | Posted in | With 0 comments
Adverse Drug reaction
Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) are types of adverse drug events (ADEs) (1). ADEs include ADRs, medication errors, and other drug-related problems. ADEs are the negative conscqucnces of drug misadventures. Henri Manasse defined drug misadventure as the iatrogenic hazard that is an inherent risk when drug therapy is indicated. This chapter will focus on ADRs.


Definitions
The World Health Organization’s (WHO) and Karch and Lasagna’s definitions of an ADR are quite similar. An ADR is any response to a drug that is noxious and unintended, and occurs at doses used for prophylaxis, diagnosis, or therapy, excluding failure to accomplish the intended purpose
(2). The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) focuses on ADRs that have unexpected rcactions and/or those of more signilkant morbidity. These ADRs would include those where the patient outcome is death, life-threatening, hospitalization, disability, congenital anomaly, or required intcrvention to prevent permanent impairment or damage
(3). The Joint Commission on Accreditation of Hcalthcare Organizations (JCAHO) is conccrned with the reporting of significant ADRs. Thosc that result in morbidity, require additional treatment, require an incrcased lcngth 01 stay, temporarily or pcrmanently cause disability, or cause death must be reported to the FDA
(4). The American Society of Health- System Pharmacists (ASHP) defines significant ADRs as any unexpected, unintended, undesired, or excessive response to a drug that includes thc following:
Requires discontinuing the drug
Requires changing the drug therapy
Requires modifying the dose
Necessitates admission to thc hospital
Prolongs stay in a health care facility
Necessitates supportive treatment
Significantly complicatcs diagnosis



By Piscean | | Posted in | With 0 comments
Adverse Drug reaction
Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) are types of adverse drug events (ADEs) (1). ADEs include ADRs, medication errors, and other drug-related problems. ADEs are the negative conscqucnces of drug misadventures. Henri Manasse defined drug misadventure as the iatrogenic hazard that is an inherent risk when drug therapy is indicated. This chapter will focus on ADRs.


Definitions
The World Health Organization’s (WHO) and Karch and Lasagna’s definitions of an ADR are quite similar. An ADR is any response to a drug that is noxious and unintended, and occurs at doses used for prophylaxis, diagnosis, or therapy, excluding failure to accomplish the intended purpose
(2). The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) focuses on ADRs that have unexpected rcactions and/or those of more signilkant morbidity. These ADRs would include those where the patient outcome is death, life-threatening, hospitalization, disability, congenital anomaly, or required intcrvention to prevent permanent impairment or damage
(3). The Joint Commission on Accreditation of Hcalthcare Organizations (JCAHO) is conccrned with the reporting of significant ADRs. Thosc that result in morbidity, require additional treatment, require an incrcased lcngth 01 stay, temporarily or pcrmanently cause disability, or cause death must be reported to the FDA
(4). The American Society of Health- System Pharmacists (ASHP) defines significant ADRs as any unexpected, unintended, undesired, or excessive response to a drug that includes thc following:
Requires discontinuing the drug
Requires changing the drug therapy
Requires modifying the dose
Necessitates admission to thc hospital
Prolongs stay in a health care facility
Necessitates supportive treatment
Significantly complicatcs diagnosis